Genre:
Musical
Director: Bill Condon
Starring: Jamie Foxx, Beyoncé Knowles,
Eddie Murphy, Danny Glover, Anika Noni Rose, Jennifer Hudson,
Keith Robinson, Bobby Slayton
RunTime: 2 hrs 11 mins
Released By: UIP
Rating: PG (Drug References)
Official Website: http://www.dreamgirls.dreamworks.com
Opening
Day: 22 Feb 2007
Soundtrack: ACCESS
"DREAMGIRLS" Soundtrack Review
Synopsis
:
Based
on the Tony Award-winning musical “Dreamgirls”
and set in the turbulent late 1960s and early '70s, ‘Dreamgirls’
follows the rise of a trio of women -- Effie (Jennifer Hudson),
Deena (Beyonce Knowles) and Lorrell (Anika Noni Rose) -- who
have formed a promising girl group called The Dreamettes.
At a talent competition, they are discovered by an ambitious
manager named Curtis Taylor Jr. (Jamie Foxx), who offers them
the opportunity of a lifetime: to become the back-up singers
for headliner James "Thunder" Early (Eddie Murphy).
Movie
Review:
It’s
Oscar time and magic is in the air…or so it might have
you believe. And what better way to kick off than to talk
about this year’s most Oscar nominated and controversially
excluded Best Picture nominee in Bill Condon’s “Dreamgirls”.
Several stage to screen reinventions later such as “Chicago”,
“Rent” and “The Producers” wherein
some were abortions and some were perhaps as decent than anybody
could hope for, comes a story modeled closely after the formation
of Detroit’s Motown Records. It’s mostly based
on how Diana Ross was chosen to be de facto leader and face
of The Supremes, effectively relegating its lead singer, the
late Florence Ballard to backup vocals and later lead to her
ouster from the group. Indeed the mirror reflects Beyonce’s
own Destiny’s Child since its inception that includes
her own domineering manager, revolving door of talents and
a stronger emphasis on marketing than on the music. Not to
mention the shocking physical similarity between a younger
Diana Ross and Beyonce.
“Dreamgirls”
cleaves closely to the contours of the 1982 musical, which
had the mercurial Effie White's (Jennifer Hudson) part beefed
up for its original Effie in Jennifer Holiday that really
made that character thrust itself upon audiences. Effie is
big, loud and proud and has a greater character arc than Beyonce’s
in Deena Jones where she does her best impression of an empty
shell. And aside from their relatively equal screen times,
what audiences are bound to notice in Hudson’s effervescent
quality and dare I say, her off-screen success story, is a
much more interesting and appealing aspect to sink their teeth
into. There’s no doubting that her presence is that
special something that will be taken away with a smile even
when it dawns upon them that she’s more a bona fide
theatrical vocal performer than she is a screen actress.
And in
another off-screen tale of career revitalisation, perpetual
scene-stealer and massive screen presence, Eddie Murphy plays
James Thunder Early - the James Brown-esque soulster that
takes on the trio early on in their newfound careers. Perhaps
little more than an amalgamation of his sketch-show characterisations
in the beginning, Murphy lets fly with his once (last seen
circa 1985) impressive acting chops late on with a ponderous
look of profound sadness that reveals the compromise and ruthlessness
of the business they are in. But then the outstanding performances
and sublime musical numbers stops mattering when the film
gets lost in transition.
Condon
sails past the eras as easily as you can say bubblewigs. The
dramatic highs and lows resemble a roller coaster ride that
never lets any frisson or anticipation to be built. By the
time the film rolls on to its peak – the much talked
about and much appreciated show-stopping aria built around
Effie White - we already know where its priorities lie. It’s
not concerned with crafting credible characters with strong
emotional cores nor is it anxious to make a substantial point
on racial politics in the volatile music industry, but it
is important to the film that it awes and entertains through
its electrifying compositions and arrangements. Its rat-tat-tat
dialogue is a prelude to another song, rife with meaning to
be gleaned and a story to tell, no matter how flimsy and clunky
it ends up becoming. But more power to Hudson and Murphy who
already look like genuine steamrollers in the face of their
respective competition come this year's biggies in the Oscars
despite the film’s apparent discolouration of African-American
music.
I
suppose there’s an element of “Dreamgirls”
that does feel dated and perhaps even outlandishly offensive
in its constant fallback on clichés. And as I must
critique films in a contemporary framework and do not want
to presumptuously give an opinion from a perspective other
than my own, I feel the film possibly runs the risk of trivialising
the struggles of black music throughout the ages and disrespects
the powerful phenomenon that has laid the groundwork for the
current American music scene. It definitely camps it up in
favour of any real discourse on its historical groundings
and character struggles despite its callously hinted scenes
of unfair racialism that never is given the time to stew in
its vileness or the real mechanics and impetus behind the
payola system. It all serves Condon’s sprinting narrative,
to fit in the rags to riches to rags story while not getting
his hands dirty in reality but to glitter his film in the
glamourised realism of disco and pop.
Movie Rating:
(Worth an encore but nothing more)
Review by Justin Deimen
|