Genre: Thriller
Director: Tom Tykwer
Cast: Ben Whishaw, Dustin Hoffman, Alan Rickman
& Rachel Hurd-Wood
RunTime: 2 hrs 25 mins
Released By: Shaw
Rating: R21 (Nudity & Sexual Content)
Official Website: http://www.perfumemovie.com
Opening Day: 18 January 2007
Book:
READ OUR REVIEW ON THE ORIGINAL PATRICK SUSKIND'S NOVEL
Soundtrack:
READ OUR REVIEW ON
THE ORIGINAL SOUNDTRACK
Synopsis:
He was born with no smell, develops a superior olfactory sense,
which he uses to create the world's finest perfumes. However,
his work takes a dark turn as he searches for the ultimate
scent.
Movie Review:
“Perfume” starts with a scene so ungodly and inhuman
that we almost forget the film is about that most provisionary
of humanly sensations. A wry and ubiquitous narration (by
John Hurt) begins a tale of child born into the deepest pits
of life’s wretches as he slowly discovers his talent.
But even then, something was lost for good in that boy.
Based
on a bestselling novel by Patrick Süskind about Jean-Baptiste
Grenouille (a commendable Ben Whishaw), a serial killer with
a gifted sense of smell so powerful that his olfactory gifts
surpasses human conventions, allowing him to unlock odours
that nobody else can access. Believing that God himself blessed
him, Jean-Baptiste becomes driven with the sole imperative
to ‘rape’ and murder 13 girls in order to get
the components he needs to produce the perfect scent.
It’s
a departure from the director’s (Tom Tykwer) exuberantly
pithy “Run, Lola, Run”. This darkly ironic period
piece takes on operatic proportions with Tykwer aiming to
create a visual odyssey that becomes an alluring nexus of
decadence, a kind of accelerated regression into hell as we
follow a man absent of love and conscience.
A
vivid and painted recreation of decrepit 18th century Paris
together with its grime and a trenchant insight into the revolting
nature of its citizens and filthy living conditions makes
this a visual effort worth appreciating. It celebrates the
startlingly intrinsic beauty and chaos present within the
hideous while exposing the repugnance in flawlessness, striking
a balance with the psychotic idiot savant’s talents
and his nature. Its baroque designs almost complement the
complexities of the Frankenstein-esque monster that Jean-Baptiste
eventually becomes.
The
compulsive drive to collect a comprehensive assortment of
odours leads him to sniff out and experience everything the
world has to offer, without having any sort of a moral compass.
His killings offer little insight into his mind aside from
a desperate attempt to connect with humanity, possibly with
a misogynistic sense of retribution. And what about the pointed
references to his asexuality or his alienation and anger?
The
film does not manage to convey the dense character study with
enough discipline, often choosing to assault our vision with
listless appropriations of the horrors committed when the
fascination instead lies with Jean-Baptiste. Indeed, the perfume’s
debut is curious by all accounts and just adds on to the layers
of the appealingly drab persona of our killer. The notion
of misogyny does not stop with the character however, as the
film’s women are uninteresting, and are often despicable
characters that end up as ensilage to Jean-Baptiste. They
become amoral representations of mere lust and retribution
that ends up serving a rudimentary purpose in the grand design.
Even
as the film uniformly keeps a creepy and tawdry tone, “Perfume”
allows itself to have some fun in dressing up and powdering
Dustin Hoffman’s face velvety white. It leaves him to
camp up his character, Giuseppe Baldini, a fading perfumer
who takes on Jean-Baptiste as an apprentice. It’s a
plot servicing, lightweight performance that’s interchanged
in the film’s halfway mark by a remarkably restrained
Alan Rickman, playing the wealthy Mr Richis who represents
the film’s visual shift into a richly colourful world
that Jean-Baptiste seems to appreciate but is unable to ever
be a part of. All in all, Tykwer is unable to compensate for
the lack of smell with a heightened consideration of sensory
overloading sound and imagery. It’s a film that takes
its absurd subject a tad too seriously with an uneven bouquet
that turns bad at the end.
Movie Rating:
(Gorgeous and intriguing but an ultimately flawed attempt
at a study of the nasally obsessed serial killer)
Review by Justin Deimen
|